A Cap and Trade tale of the transparent Obama administration
Their prophet of global warming didn’t have a halo, and though he had failed at governing, he was still a politician and knew how to bring his message to the people. It was a message of doom and gloom. His message reverberated with those who didn’t bother to check his facts. They liked the pictures and graphs he presented to convince them.
Why should they be further confused with facts?
The prophet earned a great prize and accepted invitations to speak around the world. People liked his message of gloom and doom and he was good at spreading the message. He was rewarded greatly for his appearances even after he admitted, sometimes one had to exaggerate to get the point across.
By and by other scientists began to produce the really inconvenient truths that disputed the global warming myth and pointed to flaws in his message. Others showed that man’s influence on the weather was small as compared to sun flares and atmospheric storms.
They showed changing patterns of gulf streams that influenced warming of the oceans and didn’t panic when the prophet pronounced death to the solar ice caps.
The dissenting scientists produced reports based on new findings versus the prophet of doom’s flawed findings.
There were questions, but there were no honest debates.
Alas, the transparent president would not permit the CEI publish their report. They knew it would have a negative effect on the “Cap and tax the heck out of Americans bill.” The bill passed the House with the help of 8 RINOs and the $$$ sentence was handed down to the American people.
Some accepted it gladly – and obediently drank deep.
http://cei.org/cei_files/fm/active/0/DOC062509-004.pdf
—
Carbongate
INVESTOR’S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Friday, June 26, 2009 4:20 PM PT
Climate Change: A suppressed EPA study says old U.N. data ignore the decline in global temperatures and other inconvenient truths. Was the report kept under wraps to influence the vote on the cap-and-trade bill?
—
How many jobs will cap and tax bill create ?????
Job Losses From Obama Green Stimulus Foreseen in Spanish Study
March 27 (Bloomberg) — Subsidizing renewable energy in the U.S. may destroy two jobs for every one created if Spain’s experience with windmills and solar farms is any guide.
For every new position that depends on energy price supports, at least 2.2 jobs in other industries will disappear, according to a study from King Juan Carlos University in Madrid.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a2PHwqAs7BS0